<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by UserLand Frontier v9.0 on 4/9/2004; 8:12:14 AM Eastern -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Scripting News</title>
		<link>http://www.scripting.com/</link>
		<description>It's even worse than it appears.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 1997-2004 Dave Winer</copyright>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:12:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<generator>UserLand Frontier v9.0</generator>
		<managingEditor>dwiner@cyber.law.harvard.edu</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>dwiner@cyber.law.harvard.edu</webMaster>
		<item>
			<description>Session: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/bloggerCon/2004/04/09#a1119&quot;&gt;Personal TV Networks&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 10:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2004/04/09#When:6:09:52AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Question: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/bloggerCon/2004/04/09#a1120&quot;&gt;Is moblogging a new market?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2004/04/09#When:7:38:00AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/bloggerCon/2004/04/07#a1098&quot;&gt;We've got enough money&lt;/a&gt; for the evening reception, and probably some refreshments during the day. We could use more money for breakfast and more refreshments. We've got almost four hundred people registered!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 10:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2004/04/09#When:6:44:08AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3611227.stm&quot;&gt;BBC&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;By the year 2010, file-sharers could be swapping news rather than music, eliminating censorship of any kind.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 10:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2004/04/09#When:6:52:58AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Seth Godin: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/78/sgodin.html&quot;&gt;You Are Your References&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:17:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2004/04/09#When:7:17:18AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>New header graphic: &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.scripting.com/dir/davesWorld/history/previousHeaderGraphics/wisteriaInBloom&quot;&gt;Wisteria in Bloom&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 10:09:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2004/04/09#When:6:09:46AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>A couple of disclosures</title>
			<link>http://archive.scripting.com/2004/04/09#aCoupleOfDisclosures</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;I need to make a couple of disclosures, but I want to be as sensitive as I can. I don't want to be part of supposedly open processes that only include a small number of people. They aren't open, you could say say they're &quot;as open as possible,&quot; to be generous; or &quot;exclusive,&quot; to be really accurate. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I've had several email exchanges and one conference call about formalizing the specification for &lt;a href=&quot;http://backend.userland.com/rss092&quot;>RSS&lt;/a> with a standards organization. My position in these private communications is exactly stated in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#roadmap&quot;&gt;Roadmap&lt;/a&gt; section of the RSS 2.0 spec. I'm basically explaining how it would apply to a formalization process, which I would support. I would not agree to be the chair of a working group, probably even wouldn't make sense for me to be a member of the group. That's all that's happened so far. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;Second, I've been helping the evangelists at Microsoft, Lenn Pryor, Jeff Sandquist, Robert Scoble, in formulating a new approach to working with developers. I plan to be open about this too, because my goal here is to help bootstrap a two-party system, and when that's working, a three-party system, and so on. I think Microsoft can exist very well in that kind of environment, but it's going to be a tough thing to pull off, because they're so large, and they're basically a gravity well, largely influenced by their own internal conversation, that it's hard for an average MS person to understand why people outside MS even bother to exist. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;And now with so many of them having weblogs, it's going to be hard to keep MS people frrom interfering. But that was the problem with Apple, and Netscape and now Google; and it will be a problem in the tech industry until it's solved. How can an organization be clued in, and still work with outsiders. This could be something David Weinberger looks into at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/bloggerCon/2004/04/07#a1077&quot;&gt;session&lt;/a&gt; he's leading at BloggerCon.&lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:52:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2004/04/09#aCoupleOfDisclosures</guid>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
