<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by UserLand Frontier v9.0.1 on 4/2/2005; 5:39:18 PM Pacific -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Scripting News</title>
		<link>http://www.scripting.com/</link>
		<description>It's even worse than it appears.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 1997-2005 Dave Winer</copyright>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:39:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<generator>UserLand Frontier v9.0.1</generator>
		<managingEditor>dwiner@cyber.law.harvard.edu</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>dwiner@cyber.law.harvard.edu</webMaster>
		<item>
			<description>BBC: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4399715.stm&quot;&gt;Pope John Paul II dead at 84&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:22:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#When:5:22:23PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/04/02.html#a9799&quot;&gt;Scoble&lt;/a&gt; is a man of respect. &quot;My co-author Shel Israel gave me heck for being too nice to my fellow bloggers.&quot; Right on. Too much footsie in the blogosphere. Enough. Just the facts please. Enough telling me about your friends. Make some new enemies for a change. </description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#When:5:23:46PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Listening to the endless radio &quot;coverage&quot; of the Pope's death, it's remarkable how unbalanced it is. They have priests, saying we all know deep inside the Pope was right about everything. Hello. Earth to Catholics. The Pope was a good PR guy, but come on, he was &lt;i&gt;against birth control.&lt;/i&gt; The Catholics actually burned condoms in AIDS-plagued Africa. Now would be a great opportunity for some of the real reporting the pros are so famous for. Instead they're running an endless infomercial for the Catholic Church. Hey the Catholics are the church of sin and hell, fire and brimstone. If ever there were an opportunity to be balanced this is it. No more footsie? Heh, yeah sure. </description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:28:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#When:5:28:45PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rexblog.com/2005/04/02#a6357&quot;&gt;Rex Hammock&lt;/a&gt; isn't playing footsie. &quot;Do I really need all that crap portalized?&quot; Tell it like it is bro.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:32:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#When:5:32:33PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/entry/2005/04/02.html#2532&quot;&gt;Rogers Cadenhead&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Every time commercial developers create an innovative new software category, as Netscape, UserLand Software and Pyra Labs did in weblogging and syndication, open source coders follow behind with software that makes it harder to earn a living in that niche.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#When:5:35:16PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.darrenbarefoot.com/archives/002518.html&quot;&gt;Why&lt;/a&gt; Darren Barefoot isn't smoking the podcasting dope. </description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:54:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#When:4:54:24PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>5PM Eastern: I've arrived safely back at the beach in Florida. Had a great time in NYC, look forward to going back soon. </description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:48:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#When:4:48:38PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://fury.com/article/2122.php&quot;&gt;Kevin Fox&lt;/a&gt; on a Ben Hammersley &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,1448381,00.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; in the Guardian. &quot;The trouble is that his datapoints are pretty selective, and in some cases are flat-out incorrect.&quot; </description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:46:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#When:7:46:40AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reviewing the Yahoo 360 launch, after the fact</title>
			<link>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#reviewingTheYahoo360LaunchAfterTheFact</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.scripting.com/2005/03/29#yahoo360ShowsUpSorta&quot;&gt;The launch&lt;/a&gt; of Yahoo 360 seems so long ago, but it was just six days. How did it go? This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050330/1639/&quot;&gt;screed&lt;/a&gt; nails it. Invite-only, exclusive, two-tier marketing of beta services, a tradition started by Google (as far as anyone knows) don't work. It only worked for Gmail because there was great anticipation, the idea was new (the method of marketing, that is), and you could use Gmail to communicate with people who didn't use Gmail. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;Everything about &lt;a href=&quot;http://360.yahoo.com/&quot;&gt;Yahoo 360&lt;/a&gt; is for members only, and in the first few hours of its life in the blogosphere, &lt;i&gt;most people couldn't get in.&lt;/i&gt; Now, after it's launched, there's no way to see anything other than a ghost town. Maybe that's all there is, maybe not. But for a service like this, the appearance of being a ghost town is just as bad as actually being one. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;All this fuss for a service that most people thought was a poor cousin to Flickr that &lt;i&gt;Yahoo bought&lt;/i&gt; just before rolling out 360. It's a disaster epic on the scale of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072308/&quot;&gt;The Towering Inferno&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069113/&quot;&gt;The Poseidon Adventure&lt;/a&gt;. They did everything wrong, and worked really hard at it.&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/04/02/toweringposter.gif&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/04/02/toweringinferno.gif&quot; width=&quot;125&quot; height=&quot;66&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;15&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; alt=&quot;A picture named toweringinferno.gif&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Moral of the story, big companies don't have mojo, they can't, and it's not fair to make that the issue. They can, however, make the trains run on time, and at that Yahoo does quite well. But they should leave the innovation to small, nimble, motivated devteams with nothing to lose and no corporate hierarchy to please. Hire a business school prof to do a case study for you. It's never worked differently in Silicon Valley, yet this is a lesson Silicon Valley keeps relearning. The next revolution isn't on stage at Esther's or SXSW or even Etech -- those were the &lt;i&gt;last&lt;/i&gt; revolutions. &lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/04/02#reviewingTheYahoo360LaunchAfterTheFact</guid>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
