<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by UserLand Frontier v9.0.1 on 9/14/2005; 6:03:39 PM Pacific -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Scripting News</title>
		<link>http://www.scripting.com/</link>
		<description>It's even worse than it appears.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 1997-2005 Dave Winer</copyright>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:03:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<generator>UserLand Frontier v9.0.1</generator>
		<managingEditor>dwiner@cyber.law.harvard.edu</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>dwiner@cyber.law.harvard.edu</webMaster>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thetwowayweb.com/2005/09/14#a2049&quot;&gt;Exclusive preview&lt;/a&gt; of Yahoo's browser-based email based on Oddpost. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/09/14#When:6:01:24PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Watching Google's blog search for a few hours, it doesn't seem to have a concept of page-rank. The order of the results seems pretty random. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:49:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/09/14#When:1:49:30PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/rss/pod/roberts.xml&quot;&gt;NPR has a podcast&lt;/a&gt; about the Roberts hearings. I caught a bit of it yesterday and it was really interesting. Surprisingly so. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:19:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/09/14#When:8:19:23AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/entrepreneurstechnology/2005/09/14/podcasting-blogging-internet-cx_tt_0914straightup.html?partner=rss&quot;&gt;Forbes is looking&lt;/a&gt; for, but hasn't found the profits in podcasting. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:27:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/09/14#When:7:27:05AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://paolo.evectors.it/2005/09/14.html#a2621&quot;&gt;Paolo spots&lt;/a&gt; Googlebot reading his RSS feed.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/09/14#When:7:26:50AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Google adds blog search</title>
			<link>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/09/14#googleAddsBlogSearch</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.blogger.com/&quot;&gt;search.blogger.com&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Search blogs from all over the web.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;It's also available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogsearch.google.com/&quot;>http://blogsearch.google.com/&lt;/a>.&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;A FAQ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/help/about_blogsearch.html&quot;&gt;page&lt;/a&gt; is also available. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.memeorandum.com/&quot;&gt;Memeorandum&lt;/a&gt; is tracking it. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&amp;q=%22google+blog+search%22&quot;&gt;Google Blog Search&lt;/a&gt; search query for &quot;google blog search.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;It appears to be searching the RSS feeds. Based on a little experimentation with recent content, it's not very useful as a search engine for this weblog. If a post doesn't have a title it doesn't seem to see it. It actually picks up posts on my ancillary sites better than those on this site. &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.blogger.com/blogsearch?ui=blg&amp;q=blogurl%3Ahttp://geeks.opml.org/&amp;scoring=d&quot;&gt;Example&lt;/a&gt;. It's good that they support RSS output (it was sure to be a frequent feature request) but once again they ask the user to make a choice of output formats, they really need to get this -- users don't care. And they're breaking &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.blogger.com/?q=postel%27s+law&amp;hl=en&amp;ui=blg&quot;&gt;Postel's Law&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;They might want to look at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.scripting.com/search/default&quot;&gt;weblog search&lt;/a&gt; engine for Scripting News, an &lt;a href=&quot;http://essaysfromexodus.scripting.com/aboutWeblogSearch&quot;&gt;application&lt;/a&gt; of the Google API. Really they shouldn't depend so heavily on blog posts having titles. Really need to give this some thought, I think you punted too early. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/09/14/gbs.gif&quot; width=&quot;135&quot; height=&quot;83&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;15&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; alt=&quot;A picture named gbs.gif&quot;&gt;It's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/help/about_blogsearch.html&quot;&gt;good&lt;/a&gt; that they're using weblogs.com output, and give it credit in their FAQ (something Technorati, for example, doesn't do, preferring to claim credit for our work). Speaking of Technorati, okay, Google's blog search isn't perfect, but now there's a benchmark to compare against. It sure performs well. Let's see if they can keep it running (my guess is that they can). Politically, Google is making the user pay for their religion, so that's a point in Technorati's favor. Neither company is much-loved in the community these days, but in balance I trust Google more, which is pretty amazing, considering how small Technorati is. We knew the day would come when Technorati would have to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000340.html&quot;&gt;compete&lt;/a&gt; with Google. They could have prepared much better for this day, imho.&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;Scanning some of the Memeorandum-gleaned links, Google's should do a better job working with bloggers. We do more than publish &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/09/14/summersalad.gif&quot;&gt;summer salad recipes&lt;/a&gt; and Harry Potter reviews. If any bloggers were briefed in advance, none gave it a thorough look. Also, the timing is obviously designed to steal some of Microsoft's thunder. Maybe we could move beyond that. We want to look at what Google is doing, for sure, so please give us a chance to do that, even if we won't write puffball pieces about your work, and let Microsoft speak too. Maybe even let them have a week to communicate their product strategy.&lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:54:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://archive.scripting.com/2005/09/14#googleAddsBlogSearch</guid>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
