en-us Copyright 1997-2006 Wed, 08 Feb 2006 05:00:00 GMT Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:43:47 GMT http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss OPML Editor version 0.63 Reminder: <a href="http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/01/30/berkeley-bloggers-dinner-2-feb-9-2/">Berkeley Blogger's Dinner</a> tomorrow at 7PM. Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:38:16 GMT http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/08.html#When:8:38:16PM <a href="http://www.opmlcommunity.org/2006/02/08/test-scripts-for-mac-os-x-community-server/">Dan MacTough continues</a> to work on getting OPML Community Server to run on Mac OS X. Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:19:47 GMT http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/08.html#When:7:19:47PM As part of the rewrite of Scripting News, I now have an <a href="http://www.scripting.com/monthlyArchiveOutline.opml">OPML file</a> listing the <a href="http://htmlarchive.scripting.com/">monthly archive</a> going back to April 1997. Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:45:41 GMT http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/08.html#When:4:45:41PM <a href="http://www.cadence90.com/wp/?p=4324">Breakfast with Lisa Williams</a> a couple of Sundays ago was a long varying discussion of <a href="http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/01/28/what-is-friendship/">friendship</a>. We figured a lot of things out. Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:01:27 GMT http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/08.html#When:6:01:27AM <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/08/health/08fat.html?ex=1297054800&en=a7021b811814ce83&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">NY Times</a>: "The largest study ever to ask whether a low-fat diet reduces the risk of getting cancer or heart disease has found that the diet has no effect." Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:24:38 GMT http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/08.html#When:6:24:38AM http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/08.html#oneWouldHope <p>With the Constitution under attack in the US, by our own government, how much hope is there that the western countries will express a collective outrage of the violent intimidation of Muslims to keep us from saying negative things about them.</p> <p>Just writing this little bit scares me. What a crock that is. I'm not watching Fox or listening to right wing talk radio. What are they saying about the Muslims rioting about the cartoons? I don't suppose they worry too much about their contradictions. Which side do they come down on? </p> <p>Can you find the cartoons on Google? <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=pakistan%20mohammed%20cartoon&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&sa=N&tab=wi">I tried</a>, and came up empty. Lots of <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=pakistan+mohammed+cartoon&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official">stories</a>. <s>The cartoons themselves are not on the web</s>. I'd like to see what we're talking about here. Google Denmark has the <a href="http://images.google.dk/images?hl=da&q=JyllandsPosten%20cartoon&spell=1&sa=N&tab=wi">cartoon</a>, but it's apparently been deleted from the original site. (Actually the page referring to the graphic is gone, the <a href="http://www.uriasposten.net/pics/JP-011005-Muhammed-Westerga.jpg">cartoon</a> is still there.) With Google censoring in China, one has to wonder when censorship will appear in Google in the US. </p> <p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4676776.stm">BBC</a>: "One of the cartoons shows the Prophet wearing a headdress shaped like a bomb, while another shows him saying that paradise is running short of virgins for suicide bombers."</p> <p><a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/02/08/heres-journalistic-principle/">BuzzMachine</a>: "Staffers at the New York Press walked out in protest after they were forced to pull the now-infamous Danish Muslim cartoons."</p> <p>Comment <a href="http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/02/08/scripting-news-for-282006/#oneWouldHope">here</a>.</p> Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:24:59 GMT http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/08.html#oneWouldHope