<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by OPML Editor version 0.64 on 2/25/2006; 5:41:18 PM Pacific -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Scripting News</title>
		<link>http://www.scripting.com/</link>
		<description>It's even worse than it appears.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 1997-2006 Dave Winer</copyright>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:41:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<generator>OPML Editor version 0.64</generator>
		<managingEditor>dave@scripting.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>dave@scripting.com</webMaster>
		<item>
			<description>I had a long &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yanksing.com/&quot;&gt;Dim Sum&lt;/a&gt; lunch in SF yesterday with &lt;a href=&quot;http://photomatt.net/&quot;&gt;Matt Mullenweg&lt;/a&gt;, the lead developer of WordPress. We talked about a lot of things, it was very pleasant and very productive.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:37:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/25.html#When:3:37:56PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.opml.org/Thinking/2006/02/25#theFuterOfFreeOpmlBlogHosting&quot;&gt;This comment&lt;/a&gt; is becoming more frequent in the OPML community, and I'm glad people are thinking about how long the free hosting is going to last, because, while I have no plans to stop hosting sites for free, it will eventually happen, and when it does, it's better if people are prepared. One thing that's cool is that all the data resides on your system, I'm just rendering it, so you won't ever lose the data because the server went down. Also, since all the software is GPL, it's possible that at some point a commercial service will offer hosting. In fact, I'm kind of trying to drive things that way, so that at some point the idea will occur to a business-person, hey I could offer these people a service and make some money. It hasn't happened yet, but I hope it will someday, hopefully soon. </description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:34:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/25.html#When:3:34:02PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>In tech, when someone says something is complicated, check it out, they're probably trying to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FUD&quot;&gt;confuse&lt;/a&gt; you. That's why I called it Really &lt;i&gt;Simple&lt;/i&gt; Syndication, as a clue. If it's really simple, what could be confusing? </description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:42:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/25.html#When:1:42:41PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/05/19/meter.gif&quot; width=&quot;65&quot; height=&quot;160&quot; hspace=&quot;20&quot; vspace=&quot;15&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; &gt;When I meet someone who says they're thinking of quitting, but they hear it's really hard, I say nahh, that's just what the tobacco industry wants you to think. It's actually much easier than they say. You quit smoking by not smoking one day, then not smoking the second day. And so on through the first week. All you have to do is deal with the cravings, which &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; be really irritating, because the drug is addictive. There's an drug called Wellbutrin that can diminish the cravings. Anyway, millions of people have quit, so how hard could it really be? After the first week it's much easier. And then it gets ridiculously easy. Eventually your body tunes in to how harmful it is, and that makes it no trick to stay unaddicted. </description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:48:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/25.html#When:1:48:47PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.opml.org/amyloo/2006/02/25#imgSrchttphostingopmlorgamylooositeimages1dotohgif&quot;&gt;Amyloo&lt;/a&gt; has a gorgeous &lt;a href=&quot;http://hosting.opml.org/amyloo/osite/1.htm&quot;&gt;mockup&lt;/a&gt; of an OPML Editor site. Oooooh. I like it!!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/25.html#When:12:26:53PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Essay: &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/02/25/about-the-back-channel/&quot;&gt;Why the backchannel is bad for RSS&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/25.html#When:10:13:03AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/02/25/about-the-back-channel/#comment-1814&quot;&gt;Brad Feld posted&lt;/a&gt; the letter that prompted the essay above.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:03:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/25.html#When:12:03:46PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/02/20/newsgator-sixapart-feedburner-technorati/#comment-1804&quot;&gt;Eric&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Every time somebody decides to 'fix' the standard, I get one more RSS variant to crawl.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/02/25.html#When:10:27:40AM</guid>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>