<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by OPML Editor version 0.71 on 12/16/2006; 8:23:07 PM Pacific -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Scripting News</title>
		<link>http://www.scripting.com/</link>
		<description>It's even worse than it appears.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 1997-2006 Dave Winer</copyright>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:23:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<generator>OPML Editor version 0.71</generator>
		<managingEditor>dave@scripting.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>dave@scripting.com</webMaster>
		<item>
			<description>Time named its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html&quot;&gt;person of the year&lt;/a&gt;, and it's &lt;i&gt;you!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:12:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/12/16.html#When:8:12:23PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I got a nice mention in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570705,00.html&quot;&gt;one of the cover stories&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>YouTube: &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=NT0LKMSSAW0&quot;&gt;Hand Farting the Star Spangled Banner&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/12/16.html#When:8:22:29PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/scriptingnews/324416112/&quot;&gt;Hot&lt;/a&gt; fire keeps you &lt;a href=&quot;http://blip.tv/file/117123/&quot;&gt;warm&lt;/a&gt;. New header &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2006/12/16/fireplace.jpg&quot;&gt;graphic&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 02:14:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/12/16.html#When:6:14:55PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/scriptingnews/324332261/&quot;&gt;Today meat sauce&lt;/a&gt;, tomorrow lasagna. &quot;;-&gt;&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 00:20:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/12/16.html#When:4:20:12PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Goodbye to the embargo</title>
			<link>http://www.scripting.com/2006/12/16.html#goodbyeToTheEmbargo</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2006/12/16/bozo.jpg&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;275&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;15&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; alt=&quot;A picture named bozo.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://glasshouse.waggeneredstrom.com/blogs/frankshaw/archive/2006/12/15/end-of-the-embargo.aspx&quot;&gt;I read on Frank Shaw's blog&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.valleywag.com/tech/media-relations/last-days-of-the-embargo-222139.php&quot;&gt;Nick Denton thinks&lt;/a&gt; that embargoes will soon be a thing of the past. I think this is a good thing, even though I fully understand why big companies like Microsoft (Shaw's client) have attempted to orchestrate product rollouts in the past. It made more sense before there were blogs, when the number of news outlets was finite, and when most people were dependent on intermediaries to find out about new products. That hasn't been true for quite some time, and it will be less true in the future. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;The embargo system led to an inbred information flow, and created opportunities for competitors that didn't have the ear of the big pubs, like the NY Times, Fortune, Business Week or the Wall Street Journal. How many of the ideas that made a difference in the last few years were rolled out in the orchestrate and embargo system? When you see a rollout that's been orchestrated does that make you more or less interested? For me, if 18 big publications got the story before me, I'm not interested at all. If Om and Mike got it before me, ditto. And in a world where everyone is a publication, you just can't play favorites, you have to find a way to spread the news on your own, without help from middlemen. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;Luckily it's easy to do. No reason you can't cover your own rollout. It requires that you undestand your product, have an idea how people will see it. It means maybe you haven't been that secretive about it while you were creating it. Chris Anderson's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2006/12/what_would_radi_1.html&quot;&gt;list&lt;/a&gt; of  transparency features, which we've been &lt;a href=&quot;http://davenet.scripting.com/2002/05/07/howToStartAWeblogforProfessionalJournalists&quot;&gt;writing about&lt;/a&gt; here for years, apply to businesses too. So what if your competitors know where you're going. Stop worrying about them so much, think more about the users.&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2006/12/16/evilpreacher.gif&quot; width=&quot;73&quot; height=&quot;93&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;15&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; alt=&quot;A picture named evilpreacher.gif&quot;&gt;The embargo system is a throwback to the ivory tower development system. But I'm sure of this -- in the future, the users are the designers, so you can't hide your ideas from them, they already know them, if you're barking up the right tree, if your ideas are any good. So goodbye to embargoes, and good riddance.&lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2006/12/16.html#goodbyeToTheEmbargo</guid>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>