<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by OPML Editor version 0.71 on 1/31/2007; 7:54:26 PM Pacific -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Scripting News</title>
		<link>http://www.scripting.com/</link>
		<description>It's even worse than it appears.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 1997-2007 Dave Winer</copyright>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:54:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<generator>OPML Editor version 0.71</generator>
		<managingEditor>dave@scripting.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>dave@scripting.com</webMaster>
		<item>
			<title>Makezine, PT and today's bomb scare in Boston</title>
			<link>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#makezinePtAndTodaysBombScareInBoston</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;There was a bomb scare in Boston today, the details are still sketchy, but on CNN they just said that the devices they discovered were part of a promotion for the Cartoon Network. And apparently a howto was published on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2007/01/aqua_teen_hunge_1.html&quot;&gt;Makezine&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;If you work at CNN, Phil Torrone has more info on how this happened. Send him an email, pt at oreilly dot com, he's a friendly guy. &quot;;-&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#makezinePtAndTodaysBombScareInBoston</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>This must be a first</title>
			<link>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#thisMustBeAFirst</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/30/ngates230.xml&quot;&gt;Telegraph&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;There has mostly been silence from the big names, including 'superstar bloggers' such as Dave Winer and Robert Scoble.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;The first time I've got a mention for saying nothing!? &quot;;-&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;There's a simple reason for me having nothing to say about Vista -- I don't know anything about it. All attempts to be included in their public relations program have been met with silence. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;What makes it better than XP? I hear they have some &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.flickr.com/flickrblog/2007/01/a_key_benefit_o.html&quot;&gt;screens&lt;/a&gt; from people on Flickr. Beyond that, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/default.mspx&quot;&gt;browser&lt;/a&gt;, which already runs in XP, has mostly uninteresting RSS support. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4339&quot;&gt;$500 million&lt;/a&gt; of marketing can't hide the fact that these days it's hard to find anyone who cares about Windows. &lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#thisMustBeAFirst</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Virtual hosting with S3</title>
			<link>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#virtualHostingWithS3</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;Today I'm going to learn something about Amazon S3 that I've been planning on learning for a bit of time.&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/2006-03-01/VirtualHosting.html&quot;&gt;Virtual hosting&lt;/a&gt; is a feature that I asked for back in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scripting.com/2006/07/01.html#attnJeffBarr&quot;&gt;July&lt;/a&gt; of last year, and it turned out it had already been implemented. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;It makes it possible to store static stuff up in Amazon space, instead of having to rent expensive server space, which I currently do. My server bills come to $1200 every month. I think I can get that down quite a bit, using Amazon, but first I have to figure out how this works.&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/01/washington/01ivins.html?ex=1327986000&amp;en=3421d3ca1042983f&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://s3.amazonaws.com/images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2007/01/31/ivins.jpg&quot; width=&quot;105&quot; height=&quot;125&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;15&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; alt=&quot;A picture named ivins.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;1. I created a CNAME, pointing &lt;a href=&quot;http://aws.scripting.com/&quot;&gt;aws.scripting.com&lt;/a&gt; to s3.amazonaws.com. When I access this address, I get the &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2007/01/31/nosuchbucket.gif&quot;&gt;error response&lt;/a&gt;, which is good, it's what I expected. Next, I'll create a bucket with the name aws.scripting.com, and put some files in it. There's still part of the puzzle I don't understand, which is what is to stop anyone else from creating a bucket with that name. How does S3 decide among several buckets with that name? (Right now there are none, so when I create one, that won't be a problem.)&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;2. I've created the bucket, and uploaded a bunch of files, including one called &lt;a href=&quot;http://aws.scripting.com/lincoln.jpg&quot;&gt;lincoln.jpg&lt;/a&gt;. I'm getting AccessDenied as the error code now, even though (I thought) I created the bucket with full read-write access.&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;3. I've got the bucket working, thanks for lots of great help in &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/scripting-news-for-1312007/#comment-42608&quot;&gt;today's comments&lt;/a&gt;. Came across a &lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3247/&quot;&gt;Firefox add-on&lt;/a&gt; that makes it easy to browse and edit your S3 structure. It's almost an end-user thing (add a Godaddy account for domain mapping and you're there). Net-net, I couldn't use it to host scripting.com because there's no concept of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa?threadID=10849&amp;start=0&amp;tstart=0&quot;&gt;default file&lt;/a&gt;. Seems like such a small thing. However, I should be able to use it to offload a bunch of my static storage. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;4:44PM: I'm moving over my first website to Amazon, &lt;a href=&quot;http://static2.podcatch.com/&quot;&gt;an old static store&lt;/a&gt;, with early podcasts from the original crew, myself, Dawn &amp; Drew and Adam Curry. We had big plans back then. I have a bunch of these sites, and as a result I should be able to retire one of my servers. Saving money, I hope. &quot;;-&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#virtualHostingWithS3</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Flickr people are smart</title>
			<link>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#theFlickrPeopleAreSmart</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thomashawk.com/2007/01/theres-some-mighty-pissed-off-flickr.html&quot;&gt;Thomas&lt;/a&gt;, I don't want Flickr to do the dumb thing they're proposing to do, but I figure when they actually do it, and I no longer can get into my account, &lt;i&gt;that's&lt;/i&gt; when I'll raise a stink. I wonder if they really thought this through, by the way. I have a Flickr account that somehow I created accidentally that's linked into my Yahoo account. How will we merge those two things? The old account is definitely the one I want to keep. In any case, the Flickr people are smart, and once they figure out how stupid this idea is, they won't actually do it. Count on it. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;BTW, not only are they smart, but they're also nice! They won't screw this one up. &quot;;-&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#theFlickrPeopleAreSmart</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Apple hides the app</title>
			<link>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#appleHidesTheApp</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2007/01/31/burdened.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2007/01/31/lbj.jpg&quot; width=&quot;65&quot; height=&quot;71&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;15&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; alt=&quot;A picture named lbj.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I wonder if anyone else has bought the $1.99 patch for Macs that enables 802.11n support. I just purchased it, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/scriptingnews/375586629/&quot;&gt;order status page&lt;/a&gt; says &quot;electronically delivered&quot; but where was it electronically delivered? To me it feels like this is something I should have gotten through the software update mechanism, I'm not an accountant, but okay I paid the $1.99, now what? Any clues would be much appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;Wes Felter offered a &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/scripting-news-for-1312007/#comment-42595&quot;&gt;clue&lt;/a&gt;, there were no links in the email, but, on the Store website, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/scriptingnews/375711092/&quot;&gt;Your Account page&lt;/a&gt; has a section called Downloadable Software, and that's where a link to the download could be found. &lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/31.html#appleHidesTheApp</guid>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>