|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tomorrow begins the year we decide who won the Long Bet between weblogs and the NY Times. The Rolling Stones sang Time Waits for No One. EngadgetHD: "The 'plug and play' approach that has become quite common on today's electronics didn't work out so well with HDTVs, leaving customers baffled that their TV wouldn't magically display the clean, crisp imagery they viewed on the in-store displays when making their purchase." Mike Arrington asks what is a weblog? I wrote a piece on this subject in May 2003. I tripped over two new (to me) NY Times podcasts today. One of my favorite columns in the Sunday Times is The Ethicist. Now it's available in a podcast. And they have a podcast of a selected op-ed piece from behind the for-pay wall. Al Jazeera report on Saddam Hussein execution. Doc Searls, wordsmith
This piece, about DRM, is exquisite in its imagery, in its wordsmithery, and accurate. However, I don't agree with Doc's recommendation for technology. Any software whose purpose is to copy-protect data, will fail. This is a simple corollary of Murphy's Law, which isn't just a joke, it's a law of nature. Engineers have to learn this in designing systems. It's one reason users get so pissed off when copy protection schemes interfere with their ability to use products in the way they were intended to be used. For example, I bought a copy of Windows XP to install over some bits that had gone bad on an IBM ThinkPad. As I was installing the software, it told me I would have to first uninstall it on another system it believed I had already installed it on. Now, I couldn't do this, of course, because the software was wrong, I hadn't installed it anywhere else. So here I am, almost $200 poorer, hoping to have a good user experience, and getting ready to call for help, a misadventure all of its own. Never did get the software working on the laptop. Microsoft has my money, I have nothing. If I want satisfaction I'm going to have to put more than $200 of my own time into getting it. Never mind. Lesson learned. No more copy protected operating systems for this user. I don't care how much of my rights they've taken into consideration. I don't trust schemes whose purpose is to lock me out of things I have a right to get into. So Doc, if you're going to draft a set of rules by which customer-aware companies live, put NO DRM pretty near the top of the list. Imho. United Airlines almost didn't blow it But they did. When I was checking in on the web before going to NY, they offered the option of upgrading to first class for $250. Now that was too good to pass up. Only $250 to be treated better, to get a bigger seat, to be smiled at and cared for? It's a deal! On the way back, I expected to get the same offer, and take it, but they made it really difficult. Here's how. First, I had to change the flight. Of course there's no way to do it via the web, I wish there were. I call the 800 number, and navigate through their automated system, knowing all the time that it wouldn't be able to handle it either. I pressed 0 for Operator a number of times, but that trick, which often works, was disabled. Remember that I was prepared to pay more to be treated better. Finally, I navigated to the place where it routes you to a person. They put me on hold, listening to recorded messages, but the connection had gotten really bad and I could only hear every third word. I wasn't sure if they were saying things I needed to hear, or if it was the usual idiotic advertisments. I stayed on the line. Finally, after waiting ten minutes, an Indian voice came on. Her name is "Annie." I could only hear every third word. I tried speaking loudly slowly and clearly. After repeating myself a few times I got off the phone, and checked my email. She had made the change, charged me $100, and I went ahead to the web site and spent the $250 to upgrade to first class. But I realized, sheez, I wanted to pay more to be treated better, and in the end I paid more and wasn't. My time was treated as valueless. Second, not only did they save money by hiring a cheaper person in India, but they also cheaped out on the phone line! Even Skype would have been better than the system they were using. India may be far away, but don't they have good phones? They must be losing business this way. It sure didn't feel good. Otherwise, the service was great, and I would say What A Deal were it not for this little bit of mess. The Millennium U.N. Plaza Hotel I promised the desk clerk at the Millennium U.N. Plaza Hotel that I would blog this and I am a man of my word. When I checked in there, they asked for a photo ID. He said he was going to make a photocopy. I said I didn't want him to do that. He said it was a requirement, since the hotel was part of the UN. Not sure why or if this is true, but I've been asked for a photo ID going into office buildings in NY, and generally let them have it, but I was concerned in this case because they had also taken an imprint of my credit card. With these two piece of information, there are some delicate places they can get into. If you're not worried about this, I think you should be. When you hear about schools and businesses losing hundreds of thousands of credit card numbers, it could be yours. I once had all my mail stolen. They eventually caught the people, and it was identity theft. I don't think they ever got access to any of my accounts, but they got banking records and credit card numbers. Since most places don't ask for driver's licenses, it's still thought of as a fairly good way to identify people. But not if you routinely give it to hotels and they enter it into their systems. Next time they lose a few hundred thousand identities, it may include drivers license numbers. If it's the Millennium U.N. Plaza Hotel that loses them, it will be include mine, because I let them photocopy my license. If I hadn't, I would have lost the money I pre-paid for my room. The desk clerk promised that I would get the copy back when I checked out. However when I asked for it when I checked out they said I couldn't have it. I said that's the last time I stay at your hotel, he said fine. I said I'm going to blog it (I felt stupid at this point) and he said okay. In my humble opinion, the Millennium U.N. Plaza Hotel in New York plays pretty loose with customer's identity information. I won't be staying there again -- a shame, because otherwise it's a nice hotel, reasonably priced, at a good location.
Releaselog says that the HD-DVD protection scheme has been cracked. NY Times photo of Saddam Hussein just before his death. When did Google become evil? Matt Cutts, who works at Google, on the "tips" issue. I stopped believing in Google fairplay when they added a Blog-This feature to their toolbar, and didn't use open APIs so users could post with any blogging tool, not just Google's. To be clear, I wouldn't have objected if they had set the default to work with their tool, as long as users could change a preference to use it with other tools. Long-term it would have made their tool more useful to more people, following the principle of sending people away to get them to come back. In other words, giving people choice would have made it possible for their competitors to recommend their product. Do you trust Google to be fair to all, or do you think they tilt the table in favor of their own tools and content? Perhaps the two issues are not related? Is Google something special, or just another tech company? PS: I chose this headline, deliberately, to be provocative. Maybe you think Google never became evil, and never will.
Like Blake Ross, I noticed, with distaste, that Google is inserting "tips" linking to Blogger when you search for things in blogs. Much better to call them ads, which is what they are. Red Sweater Blog has what appears to be a private document explaining a partnership between Apple and Nintendo to the employees of both companies. (May be an elaborate joke.) NY Times: "Apple said that its chief executive, Steven P. Jobs, did not benefit financially from any questionable stock awards." CNN: "Saddam Hussein could be hanged as early as Saturday." Joshua Marshall: "Hanging Saddam is easy. It's a job, for once, that these folks can actually see through to completion." GigaOm: "Looks like the much vaunted deal between Edelman PR and Technorati is all but done." Marc Canter is an original thinker. Thanks to Sanford Dickert for hosting last night's meetup at Cooper Union. The discussion was lively, lots of people with lots of ideas; the room was ideal for a 1.5 hour discussion. I had a great time, as usual, in NY. Valleywag is looking for the worst marketing idea of 2006. When Nick asked me, I immediately thought of Microsoft's laptop giveaway, but I'm sure there was worse marketing. Post your ideas here or send them to Valleywag. I am Iron Man Your results:
Click here to take the Superhero Personality Quiz
I've arrived at Wollman Hall, took some pictures, logged on the wifi. The school's wifi requires that you register with the school, but there's a Starbucks next door, and I'm able to use their wifi with no trouble (I have a Tmobile account). I had lunch today with Nick Denton, founder of Gawker, pictured at their offices, working on Valleywag. I'm blogging from their headquarters in Soho.
Michael Markman observes that Edwards is calling people to "do" now, not just vote for him, but let's get stuff done now. Hey, that's what I told him to do at our meeting earlier this year. I also urged Howard Dean to do the same with the $40 million he raised. People who listen are smart. That's the hardest thing to do, judging by how few people do it. I love it. The lasagna wiki made Techmeme! Mitchell Tyrell offers a reason I didn't get a demo from Microsoft -- they don't like the coverage they get here. If that's true, and I hope it isn't (I have been known to praise them, read the archive) -- it's a slam on the integrity of everyone they sent a free computer to. Put it this way, if I got one, and I believed what Tyrell says, I'd have to return it immediately. I never want anyone to get the impression that my opinion is for sale. It surely can be influenced, if you have a good product. And I may well buy a Vista machine at some point. I have paid for all the hardware I use today. I did once get a freebie from Microsoft, they sent a guy to my house to install both a new computer and a high-speed Internet line, in 1996, when Bill G was still running the company. Back then I said lots of things he didn't like, but instead of sulking and trying to pretend I don't exist, he engaged me in debate, and we all learned something. It's possible that some of the people at Microsoft today owe their jobs to his approach. Lots of interesting conversation with Steve Rubel last night. One surprise is that while his blog has much higher Technorati rank than Scripting News, we have higher readership. I always assumed that with high Technorati rank came a certain amount of flow. Apparently not so. Good morning from the Starbucks on 42nd St across from Grand Central Station.
56 people signed up for tomorrow's meetup, we now have a place to meet, at Cooper Union, 5:30PM, thanks to Sanford Dickert. There's still some confusion about this. I'll call Sanford in the morning, and post instructions here. I have a backup place in mind, a restaurant, in case this falls through. Looks like Mark Anderson gets a big I Told You So re Apple and their looming stock option troubles. Tonight's Knicks-Pistons game was awesome. Triple overtime. A tour de force of basketball, teamwork, and lots of comraderie among Knicks fans. The hometeam won! Last time I went to a basketball game at the Garden was 1969. Big difference is there's no smoking these days. Pictures: Knicks vs Pistons at Madison Square Garden. Disclosure: I was not offered and have not received a Ferrari laptop with Vista installed. How does it feel? Shitty. I wonder if Microsoft has considered the cost of ill-will they create among people whose opinions they don't consider important. I know, damned if you do if, damned if you don't. But it does feel bad, I thought that was worth saying. Everyone who got one thought it was a good idea, apparently. (Same with the Edwards announce, btw.) Comic of the day courtesy of Dowbrigade. Kirstie Milner says that iTunes hasn't updated any podcast feeds since 12/21?
Good evening and welcome to Scripting News, Manhattan edition. Coming to you live from the Starbucks on Seventh Avenue and 55th, across from the Carnegie Deli, where theoretically, I'm having dinner tonight with Steve Rubel.
BBC: Ex-US President Gerald Ford dies.
After NY, I head back to Calif for a brief stop then on to Las Vegas for the Consumer Electronics Show. Podtech is my host, I'll be using their facilities at the Bellagio, hanging out with the Scobles and Furrier, and my fave, Valeriewag. BTW, a little bird whispered in my ear that the next time you hear from Scoble he'll be far far away from California, doing something interesting, and surprisingly political. Interesting guess.
The future of patent laws? Chicago Tribune: "When the letter came from City Hall threatening punishment if he continued to serve foie gras at his Chicago restaurant, Doug Sohn framed the warning and set it beside his cash register."
39 people signed up for a NYC meetup on the 28th, possibly at the Google office or a classroom at Cooper Union. Hope it comes together. To be clear, I'm not organizing this; I just created a page on the wiki and put my name on the list. Good luck Jimmy I'm glad that Jimmy Wales is launching a search engine to rival Google. Someone should try to make the next big leap in search, there's little incentive for Google to try. Google is repeating the pattern of the previous generation of search engines (Alta Vista, Infoseek) were doing when Google zigged to their zag, so successfully. Today, Google is fattening up and spreading out, going after Microsoft in productivity apps, chasing the TV networks with YouTube. Etc etc. Today search is only one of the things Google is doing, and it may not be the most important thing. Today Google's profits come from ads, and that business gives them a reason to keep search weak. They want you to do a lot of searching to find what you're looking for -- and the stuff they find for you for free is competing with the stuff they make money on. So Google actually has a disincentive to make search better. Even if there are reasons to believe that Wales's effort will fail, I'm glad he's trying. We need more people who don't accept the hype, and are willing to try to get to the next level. With enough tries will come success, and perhaps a new search business that is based on the ideas of the 21st century. Response to Sean Lyndersay Sean Lyndersay of Microsoft posted some comments. He says a lot of nice things, and of course that's appreciated. But patents are a legal thing, and Sean being nice isn't material. In the blogosphere, of course it is, and Microsoft's defenders will likely say or imply that it's all that matters. Cutting to the core, the only substance I can see in Sean's comments is that their patent application is limited to things they did that they believe hadn't been done before. Even if that's true, it's not reciprocal because Microsoft received a lot of patent-free IP from the community. They made a big deal (and still do) about contributing their specs to the Creative Commons, but that is a distraction. We could have recreated those specs, if we ever needed to (there isn't yet much uptake in their extensions), but the patents are much more serious obstacles to growth in the market. Google and Apple, two other companies Sean mentions, have filed similar patents. Of course what they did wasn't right or fair, but also, neither of them claimed to be helping the community as Microsoft did, and neither has been convicted of antitrust as Microsoft has. Even so, I have been critical of both Apple and Google here, for their efforts to corral RSS behind a wall of corporate ownership. In contrast, I don't think any of the big publishing companies, notably the New York Times Company, who have made a greater and much earlier contribution to the success of RSS than the tech industry has, have tried to own it or fork it as Google, Apple and Microsoft have. There's a lesson here, and Sean is a good teacher. Yes Sean, the tech industry is bad. But even in the tech industry, Microsoft stands head and shoulders above the rest. And yes it has been common practice in the tech industry for companies to blackmail each other, to the detriment of users and the market, but that doesn't make it good practice. And Sean offers no response to the crucial question I asked, the one that cuts to the core of Microsoft's intentions. And even if he had responded, he's not an officer of the company, and his word isn't binding. His predecessor, a former Microsoft employee, now works at Google. Next week Sean could be working at another company, and his successor could say, when we show him or her how much Sean liked us, "Okay, now what?" And he or she would be right. There's little if anything in Sean's letter that we can take to court. To those that say the patent is only defensive, note that even though Sean's word would not be binding, he doesn't offer that assurance himself. I think now would be a great time to hear from Ray Ozzie. He is an officer of the company. His word, if given in writing, would be binding on the company. Microsoft isn't taking this seriously, by sending their response back through Sean, if that's how we're meant to understand this.
Anatomy of a hack CNET says I'm the "self-described co-inventor of RSS." It's hard to say they did something wrong because what they said is true, I do self-describe that way, in addition to a bunch of other ways. I'm a self-described male, native of New York, resident of Berkeley. 51 years old. 6 foot 2 inches tall. Etc. Having participated in the development of RSS is one of the things I self-describe as. George W. Bush is the self-described President of the United States. How arrogant of him! Who does he think he is. When will he get over himself. Glad we debunked him. On the other hand, he did win a plurality of the electoral votes in the last election. So in addition to being the self-described President, he is also the "legally elected" President. It's not unusual for reporters to leave out the self-described bit, unless they're trying to leave an impression that the person is silly, or grandiose, or deluded. Paul Andrews: "It's hard to believe that any self-respecting journalist who values objectivity or fairness would engage in this kind of backhanded defamation." Another pub that does this is Wired. And they go on to quote Nick Bradbury, saying that he's the developer of a "popular" RSS aggregator. They could have said that I'm the developer of a popular aggregator too, but they left that out. I also wrote one of the first, if not the first aggregator, a precedent for Bradbury's work and Microsoft's. They could have said any or all of that and it would have been true. But they had a point to make and an argument to discredit. And to do so, they had to discredit the proponent. It's an old trick, not logically valid, because whether Microsoft's patent is good or not has nothing to do with my qualifications, its decidable all on its own. If I were running for office, or on trial for fraud, then they might do well to examine my personality, but I'm not. And plenty of other people thought what Microsoft did was pretty nasty. How about talking to a lawyer to find out if it's a good idea to give them a pass on this? They didn't do any of that. What to do?
BTW, we're really feeling these quakes in Berkeley. The first one felt like a truck hitting the house. It was quick but loud. The second two were longer and shakier, and didn't make much sound, just the sound of household stuff rattling and the house rolling. Nothing fell down or broke, but my nerves are fraying. You never know whether you should just park your kiester in a doorway or try to make it out to the street. And then after the shaking is over, should you go back to what you were doing, or get out of the house? Oy. Who to believe? One of my projects for the New Year, if I get my shit together, is to do a right-sidebar thing that accumulates "open" blog posts, items that have yet to be resolved that we should keep on the radar. For example, there's been no response to my acid test posted at the top of SN yesterday. Until they give us rights to use what they think of as their technology, sorry I don't believe the people who say that it's probably just a defensive patent. I think it's really weird when big publications who take ads from Microsoft attack me personally, in a way that makes it sound like I'm some kind of credit-stealing idiot. Please see this as a reflection on them, not me. So far three pubs have indulged this way: CNET, Wired and the Guardian. Perhaps others, but I haven't seen them. Each of these pubs deserves a black eye for not bending over backwards to cover a conflict. They take ads from Microsoft. The appearance of impropriety is every bit as bad as the impropriety itself. No doubt they don't take cheap shots at Microsoft because to do so would cost them money, and if there's one thing they don't take chances with is money. So every time they say something nasty, think of the cash register ringing. Ca-ching. If you work at Microsoft, thinking you're making a difference by making cool software, shame on you. You work for a company that promotes this kind of garbage. It'll catch up with you sooner or later. This is how the business press lost its credibility, and it's why the tech blogosphere was founded in the first place, to route around their conflicts. It's not just advertising that makes them attack, it's also that they need to get a certain number of phone calls returned by Microsoft people to do their jobs, and if they don't smack me for saying Microsoft did bad, they may return the other pubs calls, not theirs. This is why if you can trust anyone you can trust a blogger who doesn't take ads and doesn't do interviews. Not saying you shouldn't take what I say with a grain of salt, I have my own conflicts and perspective that color what I say. And all this mess hides the real question they should be asking. Do they think it's good that Microsoft comes into a market that was doing pretty well without them, and before they ship a single product, are already putting up barriers to keep others out? That's good?? Really. Why? Jon Udell, you haven't started at Microsoft yet. Are you sure you want to? Antony Mayfield: "Microsoft may be giving high fives round the boardroom table for this move, but how much will it cost them in goodwill and reputation lost?"
11PM Pacific: Another earthquake in Berkeley. Ian Douglas of the Telegraph on the situation with Microsoft's RSS patent. Nice piece, except he claims that "Really Simple Syndication" was a joke. I don't know where he got that idea; it was not a joke. Steve Gillmor: "Now we live in an RSS world. What to do next?"
BTW, if you want an idea why I generally don't do interviews with professonal reporters, look at the Guardian piece and see if you can spot the unprofessionalism. They can't seem to leave their arrogance out of it. Why don't they attack Microsoft that way? Maybe they take ads from them, or hope to? Another theory on why the Guardian is so prickly on this subject -- why didn't they break the story? Their ire hides the fact that despite what the pros would have you believe, quite often they're the ones commenting on the news you get first in blogs.
Baron and Pulver, Inc.
In an environment where YouTube sold to Google for $1.6 billion, it's not surprising that Andrew and Jeff feel there's money to be made from bringing a bunch of talent under one roof. PS: What about Rocketboom? PPS: Is Ze Frank in this thing?
The BBC, in a deal with Azureus, will share high-def programming using BitTorrent. The Queen of England has a podcast feed. Here's her 80th birthday speech. Via the Telegraph. We're making progress on next week's meetup in NYC. We still need to pick a date, I can't do the 27th, when I'm going to a Knicks game with Steve Rubel. But I can do the 28th. We need a place to have it. Ideally, a conference room (or classroom) that can seat about 25-30 people, we can meet at 5:30 or 6PM, talk for a couple of hours, and then go to dinner. Anyone have a room they can volunteer? And Greg Cannon points out that it's so far an all-male affair. It would be great to get some women there. We're not looking for dates, Greg points out, but how about a little variety? That would be nice! What makes things work
I might have felt a bit differently right off the top, about JSON if I hadn't read this bit of anti-XML propoganda on site that appears to be a JSON advocacy site. If I didn't know to question such things, given the domain name, json.org, it appears to be the advocacy site. Even if it isn't JSON-central, clearly there is some reinvention going on here.
Fast-forward to 2006, after a lot of time was put in by a lot of people to get a teeny little bit of interop here and there, and predictably, it's being erased, of course, by the tech industry. I don't think there's any doubt about it. This just happens to be the week I took a look. I don't know why. Maybe I was bored. Maybe it was meant to be.
So JSON isn't evil. It's just the internal object serialization format for JavaScript. No problem. But using it as a basis for interop, when there were already good ways to achieve interop is evil, imho. I don't think that's what del.icio.us did, but I do see some people advocating that, and I think they're wrong. Am I going to do anything more about it? No fucking way. There's a nasty war in Iraq, a national election next year, I just bought a house, I may want to write a book, and I'm fighting other battles that demand more of my attention. But I'm glad we could have this discussion, and please continue, I enjoy learning new stuff. A tale of corporate atrocity I had lunch with Marc Canter yesterday, and he told me about a conversation he had with Tim O'Reilly and Cory Doctorow, where they told him they knew I had nothing to do with RSS. I asked how they said they knew. They had apparently asked some people at Netscape and they said they didn't work with me. As if that was how RSS came to be the powerhouse it is today. It isn't. Eventually Tim came around, and gave me credit for making RSS happen. Thanks. The process whereby RSS came to be so powerful was one of building out both ends of the technology, supply and demand, and putting some currency on the network, and hoping it boots up. In the case of RSS as a transport for blog posts and news articles, it did, and the two pieces were Radio UserLand's blogging tool, Radio UserLand's aggregator, and a few early blogs, including Scripting News (the currency). It also worked in a similar manner, eventually, for podcasting. Today I received a link to a patent granted to Microsoft, where they claim to have invented all this stuff. Presumably they're eventually going to charge us to use it. This should be denounced by everyone who has contributed anything to the success of RSS.
Earthquake rattles my cage 7:15PM Pacific -- Was there just an earthquake in Berkeley?? Answer -- Yes, at 7:12PM, a 3.7 quake. It was very close-by, just above the Claremont Hotel in the Berkeley Hills. Rattled the staircase in the house. God bless the re-inventers Gotta love em, because there's no way they're going to stop breaking what works, and fixing what don't need no fixing.
Then came SOAP, a re-invention of XML-RPC, that I saw as the inevitable fussing that BigTechCo's feel they have to do to give their software lock-in, make it impossible for another developer to reverse-engineer the profile they used, and make the documentation so broad and incomprehensible that it's impossible to ever completely implement it. Competition-free open protocols. Microsoft and IBM succeeded at that, with help from Sun, leading to a backlash, some of it well-intentioned, and some of it hypocritically promoted by the very same people who made SOAP so difficult to program! Such chutzpah, but already the users were so confused they thought it was just geeks being difficult.
Today I looked. I read on Niall Kennedy that del.icio.us has come up with an API that returns a JSON structure, and I figured, sheez it can't be that hard to parse, so let's see what it looks like, and damn, IT'S NOT EVEN XML! As Dr Phil asks -- What were they thinking? No doubt I can write a routine to parse this, but look at how deep they went to re-invent, XML itself wasn't good enough for them, for some reason (I'd love to hear the reason). Who did this travesty? Let's find a tree and string them up. Now. Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, this is why I'm fed up with Mountain View, Cupertino, Redwood Shores and Redmond. Give me Berkeley and New York any day. Silicon Valley is made up of little boys pulling their puds, constantly making love to each other, pretending the world revolves around them. End of rant. Discuss here. Note -- it's an incredible thread, proof that there's still a bunch of minds in the loop here. I'll probably write up a summary of what we learned tomorrow. Thanks. Time to stand up? Assuming you agree, would you be willing to stand up with other Americans, and march together to stop the war in Iraq? Would you march in your hometown, or go to Washington to help save the lives of young Americans in Iraq? Will you hold a sign, a candle, say a prayer, sing a song, stand up and be counted? Perhaps Christmas Day is a day to take to the streets?
Shall we have a bloggers meetup in NYC next week? Note, the password on the wiki is hotpasta. The San Francisco Chronicle tries to write about the Silicon Valley Asshole Society, a late-80s early-90s phenomenon. Its name was chosen so as to make it impossible for press people to write about it. I think Marc Canter was kicked out because we knew it would piss him off. And everyone said they were the founder of the society. That was the nature of the group. BTW, I was the actual founder, along with Stewart Alsop and Guy Kawaksaki. Mary Hodder recommends a conference on DRM in March in Berkeley. Reviewing the schedule, it seems there's plenty of discussion and advocacy of DRM but not much dissent. Imho there's no DRM in our future. It's like discussing OpenDoc and OLE in the years the web was gaining traction. Podcasting and RSS point the way for media in the age of the Internet. BTW, I'm pretty sure Mary would agree. The President wants to send more troops to Iraq. Almost no one else thinks this makes sense. Will civil disobedience follow? Five things you didn't know about me I've finally been tagged, by Maryam Scoble, who I saw on Sunday at the lasagna dinner. So here they are, five things that you didn't know about me. 1. The women in my family are beautiful and powerful. My mother has a PhD and she doesn't take any shit. Her mission is to get all the buses in NYC to turn off their engines when idling, and she's winning. She played a role in integrating the schools in the neighborhood I grew up in. Her picture was once on the front page of the NY Times walking my little brother to school in Corona, which is a black neighborhood adjacent to Jackson Heights, the neighborhood we lived in. One of her cousins was the famous 40s box office bombshell and geek, Hedy Lamarr. 2. My brother lives in Los Altos and has three kids, and is married to the VP-marketing of Filmloop. 3. My iPod has every song recorded by Stevie Wonder, Elvis Costello and the Beatles. 4. Some people think that one of the reasons I kept this blog going is because I am in a fight with Mike Arrington, but this is not true. I like Mike, he's helped me many times, he's intensely loyal, under a lot of stress, and I absolutely do not hold anything like a grudge with him. I never want to fight with Mike, but I don't always agree with him. 5. I might write a book. I have to learn how to write an outline and a proposal, and then after that comes the task of writing the book itself. I already have an agent, and there are publishers that are excited about it. Now I have to tag five other people. Amyloo, Doc Searls, John Palfrey, Keith Teare, Mike Arrington. Two notes about TV shows
For no special reason, I want to say that Deal or No Deal has become my favorite TV show. Ever since Howie Mandel made an appearance on Studio 60, I've been tuning in whenever I can. It's a very nice show. A little math and a lot of spunk. The last post on the Google API
Google is deprecating the API, which means, for now, they will continue to implement their side of it, but they won't be issuing new keys, and presumably we should not wait for a business plan. This leaves the door open to others -- my recommendation would be to support the API as-is so that developers who have built on it can just change the name of the server and their software works. Google blinked in search. Who would have thought such an opportunity would present itself. Seems a perfect opening for Amazon or Yahoo. Postscript: The discussion here has taken an interesting turn.
The Library of Congress supports RSS. The lasagna was so-so We had a lasagna party at the house in Berkeley last night. Lots of Berkeleyites, people from the Hillside Club, and Jen and David from Santa Cruz, Robert and Maryam from Half Moon Bay, my parents from New York City. A full table and lots of food, humor, politics, candles, fun! So many people not from the US. Let's see if I can list all the places. Holland, Germany, Iran, Rumania, Czechoslavakia, England, Tibet. That wasn't even part of the plan. Anyway, the lasagna that held such promise was in the oven too long, and while I was tending to this and than, it burned. Luckily there's a potluck on Friday night, I'll do it again, based on the theory that you need to get back on the horse right after you fall off. The dish was good all the way up to the end. And everyone was very gracious, and said it was good, but I wasn't satisfied, myself. Get your P.O.V. out of M.S.M. Dan Gillmor nails it, but doesn't go quite far enough, imho. He says that Time's wording betrays a royal point of view, a separation they cling to, that no longer exists. But I'd go further, and say that the person of the year is not you or us, but me. The correct picture is a camera shot over the mirror looking at Homer Simpson's face looking into the mirror, with pride. The theme song would be the Beatles singing I, Me, Mine. It puts the honor right where it belongs, and the responsibility too. But good on you Dan, for getting your p.o.v. out of m.s.m. and joining the rest of us!
Stowe Boyd: "Everything worth doing is difficult to do well."
Lasagna in the oven, soon to feed hungry eaters. Getting ready to bake the lasagna. Glad to have gladiolas. Oops, you might not be the person of the year, after all. Om, thanks for the kind thoughts. Maybe Ev, Ben, Mena, Matt and myself should throw a party remembering how the software of the blogosphere came to be.
Watching the Sunday morning news shows, I can't believe they're seriously talking about sending more U.S. troops to Iraq. Uhhh that's incorrect. We need to get our troops out of there. I think there's been a misunderstanding. Here's a better idea: Send Bush and his daughters to Iraq to help pacify the country. Laura can run one of the checkpoints. Hope they don't get blown up. One thing that's become clear -- the press no longer supports the war. They did, for a long time, and should take their share of the responsibility. But they won't let this war go on much longer, and they have the power. They can show us the human side of the war, here at home. Profiles of dead soldiers and their families. They know how to pull the mass heart strings. It's hard to imagine what will make them flip back to carrying water for Bush.
Time named its person of the year, and it's you! I got a nice mention in one of the cover stories. YouTube: Hand Farting the Star Spangled Banner. Hot fire keeps you warm. New header graphic. Today meat sauce, tomorrow lasagna. Goodbye to the embargo
The embargo system led to an inbred information flow, and created opportunities for competitors that didn't have the ear of the big pubs, like the NY Times, Fortune, Business Week or the Wall Street Journal. How many of the ideas that made a difference in the last few years were rolled out in the orchestrate and embargo system? When you see a rollout that's been orchestrated does that make you more or less interested? For me, if 18 big publications got the story before me, I'm not interested at all. If Om and Mike got it before me, ditto. And in a world where everyone is a publication, you just can't play favorites, you have to find a way to spread the news on your own, without help from middlemen. Luckily it's easy to do. No reason you can't cover your own rollout. It requires that you undestand your product, have an idea how people will see it. It means maybe you haven't been that secretive about it while you were creating it. Chris Anderson's list of transparency features, which we've been writing about here for years, apply to businesses too. So what if your competitors know where you're going. Stop worrying about them so much, think more about the users.
Happy Birthday Betsy the Babe!! Interesting comments on What is Victory, below.
Scoble explains why no hard questions for Bill Gates.
Wired reviews MP3 tag editors for Windows, Mac & Linux. What is victory? On the lunch walk with Lance on Wednesday, we talked about the level of reality the MSM is willing to report, and how it lags behind discernable reality by a matter of weeks or months. For example, it wasn't until after the election that they were willing to call the fighting in Iraq a civil war. Now the discussion has moved beyond that, and they're almost willing to say we're losing the war in Iraq, and that the President somehow wants a strategy to win the war. (They quote the incoming SecDef, heroically, for admitting that we're "not winning," which isn't exactly the same as losing.) Going all the way back to the beginning of the war, the MSM didn't ask the obvious question -- given that there's no evidence that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11, why are we invading them now? Wouldn't it be more prudent to focus all our energy at rooting out and destroying the people who organized the attack? It seems we should have been talking about that, not just in hindsight, it seemed that way at the time, too. But now, in late 2006, we seem to still be at least one step behind where we should be. When talking about winning and losing, how could we know, when we haven't got a way to measure success or failure? Simple, obvious point -- but, again, we're not looking at what's necessary and obvious, at our peril, really. It could get a lot worse. I don't think people are factoring that in. Or so it seems. In World War II, victory in Europe was clear when Hitler was dead and the Allies occupied Berlin. The Pacific war was over and won when the Japanese surrendered and we occupied Tokyo. Even the Cold War had a clear outcome, amazingly. I suspect most people wouldn't have thought it would ever end, but it did. We won that war too. I suppose we could spell out some formula for victory in Iraq, but until the President tells us what his definition is, there's no point. Whatever the goal, I certainly wouldn't support sacrificing any more American lives even to turn Iraq into a peaceful country. And from everything I've read, it seems this would take 10 or 20 years, if it could happen at all. But I think there's reason to believe that Iraq can't get on with finding peace until we leave, as long as the country is occupied, that will be the issue everyone talks about and fights over. So maybe the MSM could help us by starting to make this the question of the day: What is victory, Mr President, while we're waiting for you to tell us how you're going to win? Sincerely, The People of the World
Valleywag's nine best business moves of 2006. Heh. Om Malik eulogizes Al Shugart. Amen brother! Classic rambly rant from Monsieur Marquis de Canter. Scoble: "Google is delivering the Web goods and is taking over more and more of my life." Bruce Schneier: "Passwords are getting better." Doc Searls: "Henrietta's is for politics and media what Bucks Woodside is for venture capital." Aaron Swartz: "Google hires programmers straight out of college and tempts them with all the benefits of college life." An apology sent to all This I Believe essayists. Good move. I think it may have been Romenesko getting in the loop that caused them to take this more seriously. Dale O'Gorman asks the power question: "Why can't we be both the vendor and the customer?" Exactly. Master this concept and you've mastered commerce for the 21st century. Geek News: "No hard questions for Bill Gates?" My guess is that Bill Gates still likes hard questions, but the rest of Microsoft doesn't. Paolo, who was at Le Web 3, says it was a mixed experience, neither wholly positive or negative. Coming out ahead I woke up this morning with a desire to heal all the wounds of the world, to settle the war in Iraq, help the Republicans and Democrats get along, and help Mike Arrington make peace with Jeff, Rafat and Sam Sethi. But first, on healing the wounds of the world.
Before Lance came over, Sylvia showed up with a NY Times article she wanted me to read, and her accomplished friend Joan Blades, co-founder of MoveOn.org. Joan is busy but she still wants to decorate my house. Passionately. One of the reasons I love my house so much is that passionate and intelligent women want to decorate it. Me, I like colors and scenery, that's how my mind works. And wires. I really like wires. No joke, that. Anyway, Joan is thinking about the same things I am thinking about, in her own context. Get this -- she's co-hosting a conference on mothering issues, in Charleston, SC, women from the Christian Coalition! Wow. That's so cool. I'll get you some pointers in a bit. Now back to Arrington. I can't help it, I love the guy. I see recent events as an awkward statement on his part that he needs friends, and needs help. I would never turn down something like that, because long before he became an Internet superstar, he was very supportive and helpful and encouraging, so I know he has it in him, and I want to help that part of who he is come back to the surface. I wrote a bunch more about this in response to a post he made yesterday, one that I'm ashamed to say a friend of mine wrote. Let's just say he was having a Bad Hair Day, and move on from there. (Of course there's the matter of a guy who got fired, he can't move on quite so easily, and I'd like to see that have a happy ending too.) I don't think Dave Jacobs will mind me saying that, when he was terribly sick two years ago, waiting for a kidney transplant (the word "waiting" itself a cruel joke on the process) there was a time or two his anger got directed to places it didn't belong. I remember saying that I don't care how mean you are, I'm still your friend, nothing is going to change that. I understand how frustrating life can be sometimes, and know that if I stand with someone and offer my strength in a moment of weakness, there's a chance they'll survive and we'll get to an even better place. We recently celebrated the two year anniversary of Dave's new life, and I gotta say it was easily worth any small pain I had to endure. Easily, easily. So it's easy to move on from where we're at. Arrington is a good guy going through some tough times. Shit happens. My guess is that Jarvis feels the same, and maybe the three of us should get together for a dinner sometime soon, we're long overdue for an Old Farts Genius Network meeting.
Tim Johnson, the 59-year-old US Senator from South Dakota, may have suffered a stroke. If he can't serve, a replacement will be appointed by South Dakota's governor, a Republican. Johnson is a Democrat, whose 51-49 majority in the new Senate would turn into a 50-50 tie. NY Times: "Congdon -- a droll, blond Rosalind Russell for the digital generation -- has at last landed at ABCNews.com." Rosalind Russell starred with Cary Grant in His Girl Friday. Jeff Jarvis on a puzzling flare-up in comments in response to a recent Techcrunch post about the NY Times. I agree with Arrington that the Times isn't doing well in competition with the web, but I don't go as far as he does. When I think they're wrong I say it. But I also think the Times is important, in the same way that Techcrunch is important. Even if they're sloppy, self-serving, and nasty, the fact that something was said in the Times, at least for now, is itself important. News.com: "GPS devices might not help you get rescued if you're lost, but they can help you avoid getting stuck in the first place."
CrunchStorm I was talking with Scoble this afternoon about today's events in ArringtonLand.
It would be hard for Mike to do that, with all the management hassles that come with a growing network of publications. But, it might still be possible. He still has unique access to the product plans of the industry, and people would probably kill to have him involved in their companies.
A reprieve until April A lot of people are going to say "I told you so." So, to those, enjoy! I'm going to keep this blog going for a while longer, Murphy-willing, at least until April next year, its 10 year anniversary. It'll be the first blog to make it to 10, and that's a nice round number. We'll see then what the plan is. A few reasons. First, I'm enjoying writing on the web these days. Second, a project I'm working on that needs a rollout via the web, is taking longer than I thought it would (what else is new). And third, well, there's some other stuff I can't write about at this time, but I'll want to have a platform and a pulpit. Someone is picking a pretty ridiculous fight with a guy who buys his ink by the barrel, and I want to be sure I got all the tools I need to fight back. Do I believe? No! Got this email today, a plea for a financial contribution to This I Believe. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. Background: I wrote an essay for the show, and submitted it through their website. This is the first email I got from the show. No acknowledgement of the essay, no rejection or acceptance, just a request for money. This feels like shit. I poured my heart into the essay, after spending a year thinking about what to write. Now I gotta wonder, if I don't send the money, will they consider my essay. Or if I do send the money will they run it? I really want it to be separate from money. If they waited until they decided about my essay to ask for money, that would have felt better. If they had rejected it, I could have been certain there's no connection. But this way, well, I can't give them money without retracting the essay. It's funny that reporters who care so much about their own ethics have such disregard for those of their contributors. I can't withdraw the essay, btw, because I agreed to very one-sided terms (as usual) in order to submit it. Get this guys -- user-generated-content is written by people. For a show like This I Believe, you better hope they are people of the highest integrity, not the kind of person who would give you money to increase the odds. This kind of solicitation is off the wall. The answer is no. Emphatically. Ryan Tate says that what Bob Edwards did on behalf of This I Believe is wrong. Qube me baby The Qube 2 arrived today. I've set it up and it's working. I was surprised at how big it is (my first one seemed a lot smaller, but that was probably about 7 years ago) and how noisy it is. First task is to learn how to get it to file-share with a Mac. Google search for stuff about the Qube on this site. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew Baron, who will be at 
Here's an acid test for Microsoft re their patent of RSS technology, and whether or not it's intended for defensive use only. I have no patents on RSS technology, and therefore have imposed no limits on what Microsoft can do with the technology. Will Microsoft reciprocate, and grant me a non-exclusive, perpetual license to use any of their RSS technology in my own products? If it's defensive, they should be willing to grant those rights to anyone who disclaims any patents in this area. 
This morning we have 32 signups for a 
First, thanks for a great 
Back in the mid-90s, my first reaction to XML was to retch in horror at the inevitable politics that such a beast would certainly evoke. Back then I was very happy to be working on the web, I thought of it as the platform with no platform vendor, and I saw XML as a way of inviting all the would-be and former platform vendors back in to rule our lives, and prevent us from having any fun or making any money. Eventually I was 
I've been hearing, off in the distance, about something called JSON, that proposes to solve a problem that was neatly solved by 
I said it then, you'd still need to come up with an object serialization format for REST apps, otherwise every app has to start from scratch, they could have used the one SOAP used (we defined a 
The embargo system is a throwback to the ivory tower development system. But I'm sure of this -- in the future, the users are the designers, so you can't hide your ideas from them, they already know them, if you're barking up the right tree, if your ideas are any good. So goodbye to embargoes, and good riddance.
